Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Battle v. State

Battle v. State

639 So. 2d 1081, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7000, 1994 WL 363863
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 15, 1994
DocketNo. 94-198
StatusPublished

This text of 639 So. 2d 1081 (Battle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Battle v. State, 639 So. 2d 1081, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7000, 1994 WL 363863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This police officer’s failure to respond to a subpoena for deposition appears to be unintentional. His explanation, given under oath, shows he lacked any intent to violate the terms of the subpoena. His contempt conviction is reversed. Scrimshaw v. State, 592 So.2d 753 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

REVERSED.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON, J., concur. COBB, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scrimshaw v. State
592 So. 2d 753 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 So. 2d 1081, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7000, 1994 WL 363863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battle-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.