Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Battle v. State

Battle v. State

639 So. 2d 1081, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7000, 1994 WL 363863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 1994·No. No. 94-198·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This police officer’s failure to respond to a subpoena for deposition appears to be unintentional. His explanation, given under oath, shows he lacked any intent to violate the terms of the subpoena. His contempt conviction is reversed. Scrimshaw v. State, 592 So.2d 753 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

REVERSED.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON, J., concur. COBB, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Battle v. State, 639 So. 2d 1081, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7000, 1994 WL 363863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

639 So. 2d 1081 (Battle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scrimshaw v. State
592 So. 2d 753 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)