Battle v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Battle v. State

110 So. 323, 21 Ala. App. 584, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 326

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 9, 1926

Docket2 Div. 369.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 110 So. 323 (Battle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Battle v. State, 110 So. 323, 21 Ala. App. 584, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 326 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The judgment omits a description of the offense except by reference to the indictment. While it is better form to do so, it is not necessary that the judgment in a criminal case specify distinctly the offense of which defendant has been convicted, if the other parts of the record are clear in this respect. Demolli v. United States, 144 F. 363, 75 C. C. A. 365, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 424, 7 Ann. Cas. 121.

Questions raised on the admission of evidence have been examined by us. The rulings of the court on these questions were either without error, or, if error, were not prejudicial to defendant’s rights.

The evidence adduced was sufficient to present a jury question.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI