Battle v. Smith

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 2003
Docket03-7251
StatusUnpublished

This text of Battle v. Smith (Battle v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Battle v. Smith, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7251

JERRY BATTLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH V. SMITH, Warden of Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-3625-3-13AJ)

Submitted: October 20, 2003 Decided: November 10, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Christie Newman Barrett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jerry Battle, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Battle v. Smith, No. CA-02-3625-3-13AJ (D.S.C. July 1, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Battle v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battle-v-smith-ca4-2003.