Battle v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Battle v. Smith

80 F. App'x 824

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 10, 2003·No. No. 03-7251·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Battle, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Battle v. Smith, No. CA-02-3625-3-13AJ (D.S.C. July 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Battle, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Battle v. Smith, No. CA-02-3625-3-13AJ (D.S.C. July 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Battle v. Smith, 80 F. App'x 824 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

80 F. App'x 824 (Battle v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related