Battle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2010·No. 09-2387·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2387

MARY L. BATTLE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; CHASE HOME FINANCE, INC.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00462-RAJ-FBS)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary L. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Kenneth Friedman, WOODS ROGERS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mary L. Battle appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon

which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Battle v. JP Morgan Chase

Bank, N.A., No. 2:09-cv-00462-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Battle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., (4th Cir. 2010).

Battle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Battle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.