Battle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2387
MARY L. BATTLE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; CHASE HOME FINANCE, INC.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00462-RAJ-FBS)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary L. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Kenneth Friedman, WOODS ROGERS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mary L. Battle appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon
which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Battle v. JP Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A., No. 2:09-cv-00462-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Battle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Battle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.