Battle v. Eagleton

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 2009
Docket08-8018
StatusUnpublished

This text of Battle v. Eagleton (Battle v. Eagleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Battle v. Eagleton, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8018

KORELL BATTLE, a/k/a Korell Robert Floyd Battle,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution; SHARRON PATTERSON; ANTHONY RIDGES, Counsel Substitute,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-01841-GRA)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 23, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Korell Battle, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Korell Battle appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Battle

v. Eagleton, No. 8:07-cv-01841-GRA (D.S.C. July 28, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Battle v. Eagleton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battle-v-eagleton-ca4-2009.