Battle v. Director of Revenue, State

930 S.W.2d 533, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1703
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1996·No. No. 69734·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Director of Revenue (Director) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment reinstating petitioner’s driving privileges. We remand.

Petitioner’s driving privileges were suspended after he was arrested for driving while intoxicated, § 302.505, RSMo 1994.1 The suspension was sustained following an administrative hearing, §§ 302.505.2 and 302.530, and he requested a trial de novo, § 302.535. The case was assigned to a traffic court commissioner, who heard the case and reinstated petitioner’s driving privileges. The findings and recommendations of the commissioner were adopted and confirmed by an Associate Circuit Judge.

On appeal, Director contends the reinstatement order is without effect because the case was heard by a traffic court commissioner. We agree. This case is controlled by our recent decision in Chamberlain v. Director of Revenue, 921 S.W.2d 138 (Mo.App.E.D.1996). See also State ex rel. Coyle v. O’Toole, 914 S.W.2d 871 (Mo.App.E.D.1996). In Chamberlain, we found that an order entered after a trial de novo heard by a traffic commissioner was without legal effect and that the petition remained in the circuit court. Chamberlain, 921 S.W.2d at 138-39.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Battle v. Director of Revenue, State, 930 S.W.2d 533, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1703 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

930 S.W.2d 533 (Battle v. Director of Revenue, State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sooch v. Director of Revenue
105 S.W.3d 546 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)
Kuhlman v. Director of Revenue
943 S.W.2d 246 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997)
Patrick v. Director of Revenue
938 S.W.2d 951 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997)