Battle, Jr. (Jack) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JACK JOSEPH BATTLE, JR., No. 80702 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

FILED

Respondent. APR 0 1 2020 BROWN

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL °Y EPUTY CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to clarify sentencing and a motion for transportation of inmate for court appearance, or in the alternative, for appearance by telephone or video conference. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michelle Leavitt, Judge.

Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. The right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.21 1133, 1135 (1990). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to clarify sentencing and a motion for transportation of inmate for court appearance, or in the alternative, for appearance by telephone or video conference. Accordingly, we ORDER this ap al DISMISSED.

C"1:16141"2.7

Parraguirre

, J.

Hardesty Cadish

SUPREME COUR', OF New.% (0) 1947A aigera

ll

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Jack Joseph Battle, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4610,0 2 it11111111•111 t.. WIT