Battle (Evine) Vs. State

491 P.3d 736
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided July 30, 2021·No. 83223·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

EVINE D. BATTLE, No. 83223 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

: JUL 3 0 2021

A. 13ROWN

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an amended judgment of conviction.

Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mary Kay Holthus, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

The district court entered the amended judgment of conviction on May 17, 2021. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until July 13, 2021, well after the expiration of the 30-day jurisdictional appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). This court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an unthnely appeal. Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

'Ic

Lilhalre""1"1 arraguirre

Stiglich

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

OM I V47A otalbia 11- 2-14 I-

,.;;<.,; • •

cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Evine D. Battle Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA

«1 I 947A 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Battle (Evine) Vs. State, 491 P.3d 736 (Neb. 2021).

491 P.3d 736 (Battle (Evine) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lozada v. State
871 P.2d 944 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)