Battisti v. Lepkowski
This text of 217 A.D.2d 952 (Battisti v. Lepkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Supreme Court properly denied that motion. The record shows that plaintiff sustained a medically determined injury of a non-permanent nature as the result of a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff submitted evidence raising an issue of fact whether she was unable to perform substantially all of her usual and customary daily activities for more than 90 days immediately after the accident. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present— Denman, P. J., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 A.D.2d 952, 631 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battisti-v-lepkowski-nyappdiv-1995.