Battiste v. State

84 So. 775, 17 Ala. App. 328, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 17
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 16, 1920
Docket1 Div. 353.
StatusPublished

This text of 84 So. 775 (Battiste v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Battiste v. State, 84 So. 775, 17 Ala. App. 328, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 17 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was convicted for burglary and grand larceny and sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and- the time for signing the same has expired. There are no errors in the record, and the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 So. 775, 17 Ala. App. 328, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battiste-v-state-alactapp-1920.