Battista v. Rizzi
228 A.D.2d 533, 644 N.Y.2d 332, 644 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7170
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 17, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The trial court properly excluded from evidence the police accident report, since the subscribing officer did not witness the accident and was unable to indicate the actual source of the information contained in the report (see, Matter of Aetna [534]*534Cas. & Sur. Co. v Stone, 170 AD2d 599; Gagliano v Vaccaro, 97 AD2d 430; Avram v Haddad, 88 AD2d 942; Murray v Donlan, 77 AD2d 337). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Battista v. Rizzi, 228 A.D.2d 533, 644 N.Y.2d 332, 644 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 533 (Battista v. Rizzi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
OTTY Cab Corp. v. Nazir
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Noakes v. Rosa
54 A.D.3d 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Innes v. Caso
267 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)