Battista v. Rizzi
This text of 228 A.D.2d 533 (Battista v. Rizzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court properly excluded from evidence the police accident report, since the subscribing officer did not witness the accident and was unable to indicate the actual source of the information contained in the report (see, Matter of Aetna [534]*534Cas. & Sur. Co. v Stone, 170 AD2d 599; Gagliano v Vaccaro, 97 AD2d 430; Avram v Haddad, 88 AD2d 942; Murray v Donlan, 77 AD2d 337). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D.2d 533, 644 N.Y.2d 332, 644 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battista-v-rizzi-nyappdiv-1996.