Battista v. Power

179 N.E.2d 506, 10 N.Y.2d 867
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 1961·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. The courts had power to direct the board to receive the certificate of acceptance as corrected (Matter of Lauer v. Board of Elections, 262 N. Y. 416; Matter of Smith v. Board of Trustees of Vil. of Fort Edward, 1 N Y 2d 690). Failure to serve the objectors within the time limited by statute (Election Law, § 330) was not jurisdictional, since there is no provision in the Election Law for the filing of objections to a certificate of acceptance of nomination (see Election Law, § 145). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Fuld dissents and votes to reverse the order appealed from and to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that the objectors were necessary parties (see Matter of Kram v. Cohen, 293 N. Y. 746; Matter of Swan v. Cohen, 286 N. Y. 678).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Battista v. Power, 179 N.E.2d 506, 10 N.Y.2d 867 (N.Y. 1961).

179 N.E.2d 506 (Battista v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Swan v. Cohen
36 N.E.2d 913 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)
Matter of Lauer v. Bd. of Elections
187 N.E. 561 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Matter of Kram v. Cohen
56 N.E.2d 743 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)