Battista v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.

379 U.S. 3, 85 S. Ct. 75

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 12, 1964·No. 295·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

379 U.S. 3 (1964)

BATTISTA ET AL., TRADING AS NOR-VIEW FARM
v.
MILK CONTROL COMMISSION OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 295.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 12, 1964. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

Frederick A. Ballard for appellants.

Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Anthony W. Novasitis, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

379 U.S. 3 (1964)

BATTISTA ET AL., TRADING AS NOR-VIEW FARM
v.
MILK CONTROL COMMISSION OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 295.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 12, 1964. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

Frederick A. Ballard for appellants.

Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Anthony W. Novasitis, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Battista v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa., 379 U.S. 3, 85 S. Ct. 75 (1964).

Pincite

379 U.S. 3 (Battista v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth, Milk Marketing Board v. Kreider Dairy Farms, Inc.

433 A.2d 472 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)