Home/Supreme Court/Battista v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.

Battista v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.

379 U.S. 3, 85 S. Ct. 75
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1964
Docket295
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 379 U.S. 3 (Battista v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Battista v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa., 379 U.S. 3, 85 S. Ct. 75 (1964).

Opinion

379 U.S. 3 (1964)

BATTISTA ET AL., TRADING AS NOR-VIEW FARM
v.
MILK CONTROL COMMISSION OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 295.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 12, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

Frederick A. Ballard for appellants.

Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Anthony W. Novasitis, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth, Milk Marketing Board v. Kreider Dairy Farms, Inc.
433 A.2d 472 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 U.S. 3, 85 S. Ct. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battista-v-milk-control-commn-of-pa-scotus-1964.