Battin v. Battin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Battin v. Battin

94 N.J. Eq. 497

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMarch 5, 1923

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 94 N.J. Eq. 497 (Battin v. Battin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Battin v. Battin, 94 N.J. Eq. 497 (N.J. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have examined the record in this case, with the result that we have reached the same conclusion as the learned vice-chancellor, who advised the decree in which the respective rights and interest of the parties in the premises are ascertained and adjudged. Also, the bill filed for a partition and a decree of sale of the premises should be sustained.

The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance—-The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Tkenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzenbach, White, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have examined the record in this case, with the result that we have reached the same conclusion as the learned vice-chancellor, who advised the decree in which the respective rights and interest of the parties in the premises are ascertained and adjudged. Also, the bill filed for a partition and a decree of sale of the premises should be sustained.

The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance—-The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Tkenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzenbach, White, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—11.

For reversal—None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.J. Eq. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battin-v-battin-nj-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack