Battim Associates, Inc. v. L & L Estates, Inc.

186 Misc. 141, 58 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2394
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 9, 1945·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

F. E. Johnson, J.

The plaintiff is foreclosing a mortgage not protected by the moratorium. An installment due August 1st was not paid in the manner previously followed, namely by mailing a check the day before. The accountant for the owner was to blame; as soon as he learned of it he mailed it, on August 31st, together with the succeeding installment, due on September 1st. On September 10th, papers in this action to foreclose were filed with the county clerk. There is nothing in the papers to show that the late check, or the one due September 1st, was returned; the retention of these checks ought to be as significant and effective as the retention of any paper in a lawsuit that is served too late but is not returned. While the four-three decision in Graf v. Hope Building Corp. (254 N. Y. 1) is still the law, it seems to be the effort of the courts to escape its effect wherever the facts will permit (Domus Realty Corp. v. 3440 Realty Co., Inc., 179 Misc. 749; Ferlazzo v. Riley, 278 N. Y. 289). The motion to dismiss on the terms proposed is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Battim Associates, Inc. v. L & L Estates, Inc., 186 Misc. 141, 58 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2394 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1945).

186 Misc. 141 (Battim Associates, Inc. v. L & L Estates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central National Bank v. Paton
109 Misc. 2d 42 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Nichols v. Evans
92 Misc. 2d 938 (New York County Courts, 1978)
Caspert v. Anderson Apartments, Inc.
196 Misc. 555 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)