Battie v. State

835 So. 2d 1214, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 461, 2003 WL 142816
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 22, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-2598
StatusPublished

This text of 835 So. 2d 1214 (Battie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Battie v. State, 835 So. 2d 1214, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 461, 2003 WL 142816 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Battie seeks review of an order denying his motion for additional jail credit. We affirm, but without prejudice. Battie’s motion was legally insufficient to support his claim. Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). With respect to lower court case number 00-11720, the documents provided by Battie to this Court seem to support his claim. However, the record does not reflect that these documents were presented below.

KLEIN, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 So. 2d 1214, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 461, 2003 WL 142816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battie-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.