Battaglia v. Schaked

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Battaglia v. Schaked

765 So. 2d 65, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1387, 2000 WL 174042

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 16, 2000

DocketNo. 4D99-1052

StatusPublished

This text of 765 So. 2d 65 (Battaglia v. Schaked) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Battaglia v. Schaked, 765 So. 2d 65, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1387, 2000 WL 174042 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, Baruch Schaked, filed a complaint against appellant, Ernesto Battaglia, for damages resulting from a plane crash in which Battaglia was the pilot. Battaglia made an offer of judgment for the policy limits under his insurance coverage for $15,000. More than two months after the offer expired, Battaglia filed a counterclaim against Schaked. After a jury trial, a verdict was entered finding neither party liable. The verdict was affirmed by this court in Schaked v. Battaglia, 701 So.2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Shortly thereafter, a hearing on Battag-lia’s motion for fees was conducted. The trial court found that Battaglia’s offer was ambiguous, particularly because it did not specifically address his counterclaim. The trial court did not make any finding of bad faith. In addition, the court found that neither party was the prevailing party because Schaked did not prevail on the complaint and Battaglia did not prevail on his counterclaim. Battaglia’s motion for fees and costs were denied.

In MGR Equipment Corp., Inc. v. Wilson Ice Enterprises, Inc., 731 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1999), our supreme court held that an offer of judgment survives for purposes of awarding attorney’s fees even in the absence of the mention of a counterclaim. In light of this decision and Schaked’s concession of error, we reverse.

In the absence of any evidence of bad faith, we remand to the trial court with instructions to determine an award of fees and costs in favor of Battaglia.

FARMER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, Baruch Schaked, filed a complaint against appellant, Ernesto Battaglia, for damages resulting from a plane crash in which Battaglia was the pilot. Battaglia made an offer of judgment for the policy limits under his insurance coverage for $15,000. More than two months after the offer expired, Battaglia filed a counterclaim against Schaked. After a jury trial, a verdict was entered finding neither party liable. The verdict was affirmed by this court in Schaked v. Battaglia, 701 So.2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Shortly thereafter, a hearing on Battag-lia’s motion for fees was conducted. The trial court found that Battaglia’s offer was ambiguous, particularly because it did not specifically address his counterclaim. The trial court did not make any finding of bad faith. In addition, the court found that neither party was the prevailing party because Schaked did not prevail on the complaint and Battaglia did not prevail on his counterclaim. Battaglia’s motion for fees and costs were denied.

In MGR Equipment Corp., Inc. v. Wilson Ice Enterprises, Inc., 731 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1999), our supreme court held that an offer of judgment survives for purposes of awarding attorney’s fees even in the absence of the mention of a counterclaim. In light of this decision and Schaked’s concession of error, we reverse.

In the absence of any evidence of bad faith, we remand to the trial court with instructions to determine an award of fees and costs in favor of Battaglia.

FARMER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

765 So. 2d 65, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1387, 2000 WL 174042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battaglia-v-schaked-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack