Battaglia v. Boniakowski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Battaglia v. Boniakowski

149 A. 894, 8 N.J. Misc. 288, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 244

DecidedApril 17, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 149 A. 894 (Battaglia v. Boniakowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Battaglia v. Boniakowski, 149 A. 894, 8 N.J. Misc. 288, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 244 (N.J. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This suit was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. A rule to show cause was allowed by the trial judge. The only reason alleged for granting a new trial is, the verdict in favor of the plaintiff was against the weight of the evidence. Our reading of the testimony sent up under the rule, in the paper book, leads us to the conclusion, that the rule to show cause should he discharged. The rule to show cause is therefore discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This suit was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. A rule to show cause was allowed by the trial judge. The only reason alleged for granting a new trial is, the verdict in favor of the plaintiff was against the weight of the evidence. Our reading of the testimony sent up under the rule, in the paper book, leads us to the conclusion, that the rule to show cause should he discharged. The rule to show cause is therefore discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 A. 894, 8 N.J. Misc. 288, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battaglia-v-boniakowski-nj-1930.