Batson v. Squier
This text of 138 F.2d 160 (Batson v. Squier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Applicant seeks our order to allow him, without payment of costs, to prosecute his appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Washington, filing with his application the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 832. The application alleges that a similar application to the district court denied him the right so to proceed because his appeal lacked the merit required also by § 832.
The permission to appeal rests with the court in which was commenced the proceeding in which the appeal is sought. Cf. Steffler v. United States, 319 U.S. 38, 41, 63 S.Ct. 948, 87 L.Ed. 1197; Stanley v. Swope, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 308; Kelly v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 582.
The application is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 F.2d 160, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batson-v-squier-ca9-1943.