Batson v. Barrow

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Batson v. Barrow

592 So. 2d 1265, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 946, 1992 WL 21081

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 7, 1992

DocketNo. 91-431

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 1265 (Batson v. Barrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Batson v. Barrow, 592 So. 2d 1265, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 946, 1992 WL 21081 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge a final judgment rendered in favor of the appellee, the appellants’ brother, in a suit seeking rescission of a deed, or in the alternative, establishment of a constructive trust. After a careful review of the record, and consideration of the briefs and argument of counsel, we are of the view that no reversible error occurred, and that the trial court’s findings are supported by the record. Accordingly, the final judgment is AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge a final judgment rendered in favor of the appellee, the appellants’ brother, in a suit seeking rescission of a deed, or in the alternative, establishment of a constructive trust. After a careful review of the record, and consideration of the briefs and argument of counsel, we are of the view that no reversible error occurred, and that the trial court’s findings are supported by the record. Accordingly, the final judgment is AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 1265, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 946, 1992 WL 21081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batson-v-barrow-fladistctapp-1992.