Batris W. Perovich, Dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company v. Pipe Linings, Inc.

414 F.2d 351
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 3, 1969·No. 22205_1·Published

Opinion

414 F.2d 351

Batris W. PEROVICH, dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company, Appellant,
v.
PIPE LININGS, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 22205.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 3, 1969.

Aaron M. Peck (argued), McKenna & Fitting, Les J. Weinstein, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Robert E. Cooper (argued), of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, John J. Hanson, Douglas M. Hindley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District judge.1

PER CURIAM:

The District Court has a broad discretion to dismiss a case for failure to comply with its orders. We find no abuse of discretion here and the dismissal is affirmed.

1

Honorable Russell E. Smith, United States District Judge, Missoula, Montana, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Batris W. Perovich, Dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company v. Pipe Linings, Inc., 414 F.2d 351 (9th Cir. 1969).

414 F.2d 351 (Batris W. Perovich, Dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company v. Pipe Linings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.