Batris W. Perovich, Dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company v. Pipe Linings, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Batris W. Perovich, Dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company v. Pipe Linings, Inc.

414 F.2d 351

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 3, 1969

Docket22205_1

StatusPublished

This text of 414 F.2d 351 (Batris W. Perovich, Dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company v. Pipe Linings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Batris W. Perovich, Dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company v. Pipe Linings, Inc., 414 F.2d 351 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

414 F.2d 351

Batris W. PEROVICH, dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company, Appellant,
v.
PIPE LININGS, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 22205.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 3, 1969.

Aaron M. Peck (argued), McKenna & Fitting, Les J. Weinstein, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Robert E. Cooper (argued), of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, John J. Hanson, Douglas M. Hindley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District judge.1

PER CURIAM:

The District Court has a broad discretion to dismiss a case for failure to comply with its orders. We find no abuse of discretion here and the dismissal is affirmed.

1

Honorable Russell E. Smith, United States District Judge, Missoula, Montana, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

414 F.2d 351

Batris W. PEROVICH, dba B. W. Perovich Construction Company, Appellant,
v.
PIPE LININGS, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 22205.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 3, 1969.

Aaron M. Peck (argued), McKenna & Fitting, Les J. Weinstein, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Robert E. Cooper (argued), of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, John J. Hanson, Douglas M. Hindley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District judge.1

PER CURIAM:

The District Court has a broad discretion to dismiss a case for failure to comply with its orders. We find no abuse of discretion here and the dismissal is affirmed.

1

Honorable Russell E. Smith, United States District Judge, Missoula, Montana, sitting by designation

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 F.2d 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batris-w-perovich-dba-b-w-perovich-construction-co-ca9-1969.