Bator v. Osborne

833 So. 2d 884, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 212, 2003 WL 118208
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 2003
DocketNo. 2D01-5492
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 833 So. 2d 884 (Bator v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bator v. Osborne, 833 So. 2d 884, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 212, 2003 WL 118208 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

CANADY, Judge.

Larry Bator, the former husband, appeals an order assessing him with attorney’s fees. The order fails to contain any findings concerning the needs of Sandra Osborne, the former wife, or the ability of the former husband to pay fees, thus making the order impossible to review. See Shields v. Shields, 502 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Because the order is inadequate, we reverse and remand for a new hearing, with directions that the trial court set forth its findings. See Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697 (Fla.1997).

ALTENBERND and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leon v. Velazquez
79 So. 3d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
833 So. 2d 884, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 212, 2003 WL 118208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bator-v-osborne-fladistctapp-2003.