Bator v. Osborne
833 So. 2d 884, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 212, 2003 WL 118208
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 2003·No. No. 2D01-5492·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Larry Bator, the former husband, appeals an order assessing him with attorney’s fees. The order fails to contain any findings concerning the needs of Sandra Osborne, the former wife, or the ability of the former husband to pay fees, thus making the order impossible to review. See Shields v. Shields, 502 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Because the order is inadequate, we reverse and remand for a new hearing, with directions that the trial court set forth its findings. See Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697 (Fla.1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bator v. Osborne, 833 So. 2d 884, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 212, 2003 WL 118208 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
833 So. 2d 884 (Bator v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leon v. Velazquez
79 So. 3d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)