Batista v. Hill

2025 NY Slip Op 30793(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedMarch 11, 2025
DocketIndex No. 153451/2023
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 30793(U) (Batista v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Batista v. Hill, 2025 NY Slip Op 30793(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

Batista v Hill 2025 NY Slip Op 30793(U) March 11, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 153451/2023 Judge: Hasa A. Kingo Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2025 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 153451/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2025

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. HASA A. KINGO PART 05M Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 153451/2023 WILLIAM PENA BATISTA, MOTION DATE 12/31/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 003 -v- CHRISTOPHER HILL, NEW YORK CITY FIRE DECISION + ORDER ON DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF NEW YORK MOTION Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 were read on this motion to/for CONSOLIDATE/JOIN FOR TRIAL .

Upon the foregoing documents, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff William Pena Batista’s

(“Plaintiff”) motion to consolidate, pursuant to CPLR § 602, is granted without opposition.

Plaintiff seeks to consolidate this action, Index No.: 153451/2023 (Action #1), with a related action

pending in this court, the Supreme Court, New York County, bearing Index No.: 160036/2023

(Action #2). Plaintiff argues that both actions arise from a motor vehicle collision that occurred on

June 13, 2022, and therefore involve common questions of law and fact.

CPLR §602 states that “[w]hen actions involving a common question of law or fact are

pending before a court, the court, upon motion … may order the actions consolidated.” A motion

to consolidate is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court (Progressive Ins. Co. v

Vasquez, 10 AD3d 518, 519 [1st Dept 2004]). “There is a preference to join cases for discovery

and trial in the interests of judicial economy and ease of decision-making where there are common

questions of law and fact” between the two actions involved (Lema v 1148 Corp., 176 AD3d 653,

654 [1st Dept 2019]). Absent a showing of prejudice to a substantial right by a party opposing the

153451/2023 BATISTA, WILLIAM PENA vs. HILL, CHRISTOPHER ET AL Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 003

1 of 4 [* 1] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2025 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 153451/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2025

motion, consolidation should be granted where common questions of fact or law exist (Lema, 176

AD3d at 654).

Here, it is undisputed that the actions arise out of the same accident and involve the same

questions of law and fact. Additionally, there is no opposition to the motion and no showing of

prejudice to a substantial right. Therefore, a full consolidation of the two actions would minimize

court expense, as well as the time witnesses and parties will have to appear and will avoid

duplication of testimony and expedite discovery. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the above-captioned action is consolidated in

this court with WILLIAN PENA BATISTA vs. THE NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN

HOSPITAL, Index No. 160036/2023 (Action #2), pending in this court; and it is further

ORDERED that the consolidation shall take place under Index No. 153451/2023 and the

consolidated action shall bear the following caption:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------X Index No.: 153451/2023 WILLIAN PENA BATISTA,

Plaintiff,

-against-

CHRISTOPHER HILL, NEW YORK CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, AND THE NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL,

Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------------X

; and it is further

ORDERED that the pleadings in the actions hereby consolidated shall stand as the

pleadings in the consolidated action; and it is further

153451/2023 BATISTA, WILLIAM PENA vs. HILL, CHRISTOPHER ET AL Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 003

2 of 4 [* 2] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2025 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 153451/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2025

ORDERED that, within 30 days from entry of this order, movant shall serve a copy of this

order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the Court, who shall consolidate the documents in the

actions hereby consolidated and shall mark his records to reflect the consolidation; and it is further

ORDERED that counsel for the movant shall contact the staff of the Clerk of the Court to

arrange for the effectuation of the consolidation hereby directed; and it is further

ORDERED that service of this order upon the Clerk of the Court shall be made in

accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk

Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the “E-Filing” page on the court’s

website); and it is further

ORDERED that, as applicable and insofar as is practical, the Clerk of this Court shall file

the documents being consolidated in the consolidated case file under Index No. 153451/2023 in

the New York State Courts Electronic Filing System or make appropriate notations of such

documents in the e-filing records of the court so as to ensure access to the documents in the

consolidated action; and it is further

ORDERED that, within 30 days from entry of this order, movant shall serve a copy of this

order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the General Clerk’s Office, who is hereby directed to

reflect the consolidation by appropriately marking the court's records; and it is further

ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the General Clerk’s Office shall be made

in accordance with the procedures set forth in the aforesaid Protocol; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to set this matter down for a preliminary conference

in the Differentiated Case Management Part on the next available date.

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.

153451/2023 BATISTA, WILLIAM PENA vs. HILL, CHRISTOPHER ET AL Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 003

3 of 4 [* 3] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2025 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 153451/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2025

3/11/2025 DATE HASA A. KINGO, J.S.C. CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED X NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

□ X GRANTED DENIED GRANTED IN PART OTHER

APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER

□ CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE

153451/2023 BATISTA, WILLIAM PENA vs. HILL, CHRISTOPHER ET AL Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 003

4 of 4 [* 4]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kiladze v. Countrywide Insurance
10 A.D.3d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 30793(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batista-v-hill-nysupctnewyork-2025.