Batista v. Hill
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 30793(U) (Batista v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Batista v Hill 2025 NY Slip Op 30793(U) March 11, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 153451/2023 Judge: Hasa A. Kingo Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2025 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 153451/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. HASA A. KINGO PART 05M Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 153451/2023 WILLIAM PENA BATISTA, MOTION DATE 12/31/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 003 -v- CHRISTOPHER HILL, NEW YORK CITY FIRE DECISION + ORDER ON DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF NEW YORK MOTION Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 were read on this motion to/for CONSOLIDATE/JOIN FOR TRIAL .
Upon the foregoing documents, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff William Pena Batista’s
(“Plaintiff”) motion to consolidate, pursuant to CPLR § 602, is granted without opposition.
Plaintiff seeks to consolidate this action, Index No.: 153451/2023 (Action #1), with a related action
pending in this court, the Supreme Court, New York County, bearing Index No.: 160036/2023
(Action #2). Plaintiff argues that both actions arise from a motor vehicle collision that occurred on
June 13, 2022, and therefore involve common questions of law and fact.
CPLR §602 states that “[w]hen actions involving a common question of law or fact are
pending before a court, the court, upon motion … may order the actions consolidated.” A motion
to consolidate is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court (Progressive Ins. Co. v
Vasquez, 10 AD3d 518, 519 [1st Dept 2004]). “There is a preference to join cases for discovery
and trial in the interests of judicial economy and ease of decision-making where there are common
questions of law and fact” between the two actions involved (Lema v 1148 Corp., 176 AD3d 653,
654 [1st Dept 2019]). Absent a showing of prejudice to a substantial right by a party opposing the
153451/2023 BATISTA, WILLIAM PENA vs. HILL, CHRISTOPHER ET AL Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 003
1 of 4 [* 1] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2025 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 153451/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2025
motion, consolidation should be granted where common questions of fact or law exist (Lema, 176
AD3d at 654).
Here, it is undisputed that the actions arise out of the same accident and involve the same
questions of law and fact. Additionally, there is no opposition to the motion and no showing of
prejudice to a substantial right. Therefore, a full consolidation of the two actions would minimize
court expense, as well as the time witnesses and parties will have to appear and will avoid
duplication of testimony and expedite discovery. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the above-captioned action is consolidated in
this court with WILLIAN PENA BATISTA vs. THE NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN
HOSPITAL, Index No. 160036/2023 (Action #2), pending in this court; and it is further
ORDERED that the consolidation shall take place under Index No. 153451/2023 and the
consolidated action shall bear the following caption:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------X Index No.: 153451/2023 WILLIAN PENA BATISTA,
Plaintiff,
-against-
CHRISTOPHER HILL, NEW YORK CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, AND THE NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL,
Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------------X
; and it is further
ORDERED that the pleadings in the actions hereby consolidated shall stand as the
pleadings in the consolidated action; and it is further
153451/2023 BATISTA, WILLIAM PENA vs. HILL, CHRISTOPHER ET AL Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 003
2 of 4 [* 2] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2025 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 153451/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2025
ORDERED that, within 30 days from entry of this order, movant shall serve a copy of this
order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the Court, who shall consolidate the documents in the
actions hereby consolidated and shall mark his records to reflect the consolidation; and it is further
ORDERED that counsel for the movant shall contact the staff of the Clerk of the Court to
arrange for the effectuation of the consolidation hereby directed; and it is further
ORDERED that service of this order upon the Clerk of the Court shall be made in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk
Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the “E-Filing” page on the court’s
website); and it is further
ORDERED that, as applicable and insofar as is practical, the Clerk of this Court shall file
the documents being consolidated in the consolidated case file under Index No. 153451/2023 in
the New York State Courts Electronic Filing System or make appropriate notations of such
documents in the e-filing records of the court so as to ensure access to the documents in the
consolidated action; and it is further
ORDERED that, within 30 days from entry of this order, movant shall serve a copy of this
order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the General Clerk’s Office, who is hereby directed to
reflect the consolidation by appropriately marking the court's records; and it is further
ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the General Clerk’s Office shall be made
in accordance with the procedures set forth in the aforesaid Protocol; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to set this matter down for a preliminary conference
in the Differentiated Case Management Part on the next available date.
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
153451/2023 BATISTA, WILLIAM PENA vs. HILL, CHRISTOPHER ET AL Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 003
3 of 4 [* 3] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2025 04:48 PM INDEX NO. 153451/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2025
3/11/2025 DATE HASA A. KINGO, J.S.C. CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED X NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
□ X GRANTED DENIED GRANTED IN PART OTHER
APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
□ CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE
153451/2023 BATISTA, WILLIAM PENA vs. HILL, CHRISTOPHER ET AL Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 003
4 of 4 [* 4]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 30793(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batista-v-hill-nysupctnewyork-2025.