Batie v. State

579 So. 2d 917, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1991 WL 90973
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 3, 1991
DocketNo. 90-3153
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 579 So. 2d 917 (Batie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Batie v. State, 579 So. 2d 917, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1991 WL 90973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

ERVIN, Judge.

We affirm. Cassoday v. State, 237 So.2d 146 (Fla.1970); Dorch v. State, 483 So.2d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Carr v. State, 495 So.2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We note that in the event appellant does file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 he would only be entitled to obtain access to records directly pertinent to his motion.

AFFIRMED.

WIGGINTON, J., and CAWTHON, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burnham v. State
686 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Richards v. State
595 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
579 So. 2d 917, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1991 WL 90973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batie-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.