Batie v. State

579 So. 2d 917, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1991 WL 90973
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 1991·No. No. 90-3153·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ERVIN, Judge.

We affirm. Cassoday v. State, 237 So.2d 146 (Fla.1970); Dorch v. State, 483 So.2d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Carr v. State, 495 So.2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We note that in the event appellant does file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 he would only be entitled to obtain access to records directly pertinent to his motion.

AFFIRMED.

WIGGINTON, J., and CAWTHON, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Batie v. State, 579 So. 2d 917, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1991 WL 90973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

579 So. 2d 917 (Batie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burnham v. State
686 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Richards v. State
595 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)