Bath Gas Light Co. v. Rowland
71 N.E. 1127, 178 N.Y. 631, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 900
Opinion
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., Gbay, Babtlett, Vann and Webneb, J J. Dissenting: O’Bbien, J. Not voting: Mabtin, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bath Gas Light Co. v. Rowland, 71 N.E. 1127, 178 N.Y. 631, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 900 (N.Y. 1904).
71 N.E. 1127 (Bath Gas Light Co. v. Rowland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newburger v. Lubell
241 A.D. 250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Secklir v. Penney
148 Misc. 807 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)
Hanna v. Lichtenhein
182 A.D. 94 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)