Batey v. Burlington Industries

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedApril 18, 1997
DocketI.C. No. 483731
StatusPublished

This text of Batey v. Burlington Industries (Batey v. Burlington Industries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Batey v. Burlington Industries, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1997).

Opinion

Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned and considering the briefs and oral arguments presented to the Full Commission, the undersigned find no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or to amend the Order of the deputy commissioner. The Full Commission AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Order of the Deputy Commissioner.

It is THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for sanctions pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-88.1 should be and hereby is DENIED.

This the 16th day of April, 1997.

S/ _______________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/ _________________ J. HOWARD BUNN, JR. CHAIRMAN

S/ _________________ LAURA K. MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

BSB:jmf

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-88.1
North Carolina § 97-88.1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Batey v. Burlington Industries, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batey-v-burlington-industries-ncworkcompcom-1997.