Bateson v. Renown Health

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedAugust 4, 2020
Docket3:20-cv-00289
StatusUnknown

This text of Bateson v. Renown Health (Bateson v. Renown Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bateson v. Renown Health, (D. Nev. 2020).

Opinion

WILLIAM J. GEDDES 1 Nevada Bar No. 6984 KRISTEN R. GEDDES 2 Nevada Bar No. 9027 THE GEDDES LAW FIRM, P.C. 3 1575 Delucchi Lane, Suite 206 Reno, Nevada 89502 4 Phone: (775) 853-9455 Fax: (775) 299-5337 5 Email: Will@TheGeddesLawFirm.com Email: Kristen@TheGeddesLawFirm.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Donna Bateson 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 DONNA BATESON, an individual, CASE NO.: 3:20-cv-00289-MMD-CLB 10 Plaintiff,

11 vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 RENOWN HEALTH, a domestic nonprofit Regarding corporation. 13 CONFIDENTIALITY OF DOCUMENTS Defendants. PRODUCED IN LITIGATION 14 15 16 Pursuant to Federal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 26(f) and 17 U.S. District Court of Nevada Rule (“Local Rule”) 26-1(e), the parties through their respective counsel, 18 hereby submit the following Stipulated Protective Order. 19 I. RECITALS 20 WHEREAS: the parties to the above-captioned litigation anticipate that discovery will require 21 the parties to disclose records and information that are confidential and sensitive, including because 22 such records are anticipated to include the parties’ private employment records and private medical 23 records; and 24 WHEREAS: the parties seek to protect and prevent the improper dissemination of such 25 confidential and private records and information to third parties, during the course of litigation and after 26 the litigation has ended; 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 II. STIPLUATION 2 THEREFORE: the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate 3 and request the Court issue an Order (“Stipulated Protective Order”), protecting the confidential nature 4 of certain records and information as may be produced during the course of the above-captioned matter, 5 as follows: 6 1. If any person or entity, whether or not a party to the instant action, produces or receives 7 answers to interrogatories, or documents or other things, which the producing or receiving person or 8 entity considers in good faith to be “Confidential Information,” as defined in § II(3)(A)(I) infra; or 9 2. If there is deposition testimony which any person or entity, whether or not a party to the 10 instant action, believes in good faith contains “Confidential Information,” as defined in § II(3)(A)(I) 11 infra; or 12 3. Third parties produce information which the third parties or the parties to this matter 13 assert in good faith is confidential, the following procedure shall govern pursuant to Federal Rule of 14 Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 26 (c) et. seq.: 15 A. Any documents (and the contents thereof), things or information falling within 16 the definition of “Confidential Information,” set forth in § II(3)(A)(I) infra, that are produced may be 17 designated and marked, in whole or in part, without regard to whether redactions are made, 18 “Confidential” by the party producing the documents or information, at the time the documents are 19 delivered to or made available for inspection by any party; 20 I. “Confidential Information” includes, but is not limited to: (a) 21 employment records of any employees or former employees of any party; (b) confidential notes, 22 memoranda, and statements regarding non-party employees; (c) confidential information concerning 23 the discipline and/or termination of non-party employees and former employees; (d) the production of 24 information or documents proprietary to any party, including by way of example and not limitation, tax 25 records, financial statements; (e) other private information of any party or non-party to the present 26 litigation, including consumer records, e.g., phone bills; (f) financial records and business records of 27 any person or entity, whether a party or non-party to the present litigation; and (g) medical records, 28 including medical bills and psychological records, and medical information of any person, whether a 1 party or non-party to the present litigation. 2 B. If a party produces to another party items that contain Confidential Information 3 as defined above, that party may designate one or more documents, or a portion of a document, as 4 “Confidential” when producing that document to the other party. Such designation shall be made by 5 marking, stamping or typing the word “Confidential” on each page of the document at the time it is 6 produced to the receiving party’s counsel; 7 C. Any party may designate deposition testimony as “Confidential” by orally 8 making such a designation on the record either at the commencement of the deposition, at the time the 9 testimony is given, and/or before the end of that day's questioning. Following such a designation, the 10 court reporter shall mark “Confidential” on the transcript or the portion thereof containing the 11 “Confidential” testimony. Aside from the witness, no person shall attend any portion of any deposition 12 containing testimony regarding Confidential Information except the parties and counsel for the parties 13 unless such person agrees to abide by this Order. Any court reporter who transcribes testimony in this 14 action at a deposition shall agree, before transcribing any such testimony, that all testimony containing 15 Confidential Information is and shall remain Confidential and shall not be disclosed except as provided 16 in this Order and that copies of any transcript, reporter’s notes or any other transcription records of any 17 such testimony will be retained in absolute confidentiality and safekeeping by such shorthand reporter 18 or delivered to attorneys of record; 19 D. In addition, documents or items produced by one party may be designated 20 “Confidential” by the other party, i.e., the receiving party, by: 21 I. marking the document, in whole or in part, “Confidential” in the same 22 manner as stated above; and 23 II. then forwarding a copy of the marked document back to the producing 24 party; 25 E. In this regard, the receiving party seeking the “Confidential” designation may 26 designate, by number, each document it believes should be “Confidential”; 27 F. If the receiving party has no objection to the “Confidential” designation made by 28 the producing party, the receiving party may either expressly notify the producing party or allow the 1 fourteen calendar-day objection period (set forth below) to lapse. Where there has been no written 2 objection made, once a document or item has been produced and designated as provided herein to the 3 receiving party, the document or item shall be treated as “Confidential,” respectively, pursuant to this 4 Stipulated Protective Order, until further order of the Court; 5 4. The following protocol shall apply in the event of an objection to a designation of 6 “Confidential”: 7 A. If there is an objection to the “Confidential” designation, the party so objecting 8 must notify the other party in writing of both the objection and the grounds for the objection within 9 fourteen calendar days from the date the designation was made or the document(s)/item(s) received, 10 whichever is later, and the procedure in § II(4)(B) infra, shall apply; 11 B. If the parties do not agree that the documents, information or testimony should 12 be treated as confidential, the parties shall attempt to resolve the issue by meeting and conferring. If a 13 resolution does not occur, either party may file a motion with the Court to resolve the dispute. Such 14 motion must be filed within 30 calendar days of receipt of the written objection to the designation, 15 unless stipulated otherwise by counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bateson v. Renown Health, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bateson-v-renown-health-nvd-2020.