Bates v. Wotkyns

New York Supreme Court

Bates v. Wotkyns

2 How. Pr. 18

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1845

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 How. Pr. 18 (Bates v. Wotkyns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bates v. Wotkyns, 2 How. Pr. 18 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Jewett, Justice.

The bill of particulars, delivered under the order of the 17th day of October, is no better than the first, and is not a compliance with the order. ■ The facts shown by the affidavits of the plaintiff and his attorney, however, induce me to think that there was a bona fide intention to comply with the order. I therefore allow the plaintiff time to deliver further and better particulars'of his demand till the 20 th day of January next, on payment of the costs of this motion in ten days.

Rule accordingly

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jewett, Justice.

The bill of particulars, delivered under the order of the 17th day of October, is no better than the first, and is not a compliance with the order. ■ The facts shown by the affidavits of the plaintiff and his attorney, however, induce me to think that there was a bona fide intention to comply with the order. I therefore allow the plaintiff time to deliver further and better particulars'of his demand till the 20 th day of January next, on payment of the costs of this motion in ten days.

Rule accordingly

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-wotkyns-nysupct-1845.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack