Bates v. Wood
This text of 117 S.E. 776 (Bates v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In each of these cases the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the alleged errors, either of commission or of omission, in the charge of the court, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole and the facts of the case, requires another trial of the issues involved. The remaining grounds of the amendment to the motion ror a new trial are not insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and are treated as abandoned.
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 S.E. 776, 30 Ga. App. 179, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-wood-gactapp-1923.