Bates v. Wood

117 S.E. 776, 30 Ga. App. 179, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 333
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 11, 1923
Docket14232, 14233
StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 776 (Bates v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bates v. Wood, 117 S.E. 776, 30 Ga. App. 179, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 333 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

In each of these cases the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the alleged errors, either of commission or of omission, in the charge of the court, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole and the facts of the case, requires another trial of the issues involved. The remaining grounds of the amendment to the motion ror a new trial are not insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and are treated as abandoned.

Judgments affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth,- J-J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 776, 30 Ga. App. 179, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-wood-gactapp-1923.