Bates v. Whittle

334 A.2d 475, 165 Conn. 442, 1973 Conn. LEXIS 757
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 14, 1973·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question on this appeal involves issues of fact, and the judgment was a result reasonably reached on a permissible view of the evidence. Anderson v. D’Addario, 158 Conn. 616, 262 A.2d 187.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bates v. Whittle, 334 A.2d 475, 165 Conn. 442, 1973 Conn. LEXIS 757 (Colo. 1973).

334 A.2d 475 (Bates v. Whittle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rafalowski v. Old County Road, Inc., No. Cv95 0555432s (Mar. 26, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 3057 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Rafalowski v. Old County Road, Inc.
719 A.2d 84 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Spera v. Audiotape Corp.
474 A.2d 481 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1984)