Bates v. Trapp

Supreme Court of Kansas

Bates v. Trapp

220 P. 1038, 114 Kan. 882, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 311

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedDecember 8, 1923

DocketNo. 24,810

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 220 P. 1038 (Bates v. Trapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bates v. Trapp, 220 P. 1038, 114 Kan. 882, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 311 (kan 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by '

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover on a promissory note. The answer pleaded the note was given in connection with the sale of a patent right, and the statute governing such transactions had not been complied with. The court overruled a demurrer to the answer, and plaintiff appeals.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, on the authority of the decision in the case of Schmoyer v. Van Hosen, 111 Kan. 759, 208 Pac. 554, to which the court adheres, and which the court declines to modify.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by '

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover on a promissory note. The answer pleaded the note was given in connection with the sale of a patent right, and the statute governing such transactions had not been complied with. The court overruled a demurrer to the answer, and plaintiff appeals.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, on the authority of the decision in the case of Schmoyer v. Van Hosen, 111 Kan. 759, 208 Pac. 554, to which the court adheres, and which the court declines to modify.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 P. 1038, 114 Kan. 882, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-trapp-kan-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack