Bates v. Trapp
220 P. 1038, 114 Kan. 882, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 311
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by '
The action was one to recover on a promissory note. The answer pleaded the note was given in connection with the sale of a patent right, and the statute governing such transactions had not been complied with. The court overruled a demurrer to the answer, and plaintiff appeals.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed, on the authority of the decision in the case of Schmoyer v. Van Hosen, 111 Kan. 759, 208 Pac. 554, to which the court adheres, and which the court declines to modify.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bates v. Trapp, 220 P. 1038, 114 Kan. 882, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 311 (kan 1923).
220 P. 1038 (Bates v. Trapp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daniels v. Hansen
276 P. 819 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1929)
Wagner v. Board of County Commissioners
276 P. 74 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1929)