Bates v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bates v. State

439 S.W.3d 837, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 971, 2014 WL 4288107

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2014·No. No. WD 75722·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Lucas Bates appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Bates contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Lucas Bates appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Bates contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Bates v. State, 439 S.W.3d 837, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 971, 2014 WL 4288107 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

439 S.W.3d 837 (Bates v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.