Bates v. State
This text of 256 S.W.3d 220 (Bates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
David Bates appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.085 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 S.W.3d 220, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 903, 2008 WL 2572614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-state-moctapp-2008.