Bates v. State

256 S.W.3d 220, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 903, 2008 WL 2572614
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 2008·No. WD 68576·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Bates appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.085 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bates v. State, 256 S.W.3d 220, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 903, 2008 WL 2572614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

256 S.W.3d 220 (Bates v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harper v. State
256 S.W.3d 220 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)