Bates v. State

133 So. 914, 222 Ala. 688, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 337
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 2, 1931
Docket2 Div. 977.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 So. 914 (Bates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bates v. State, 133 So. 914, 222 Ala. 688, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 337 (Ala. 1931).

Opinion

ANDERSON, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree and given the death penalty.

We think that the trial court did not err in holding that a sufficient predicate was laid for the introduction of the confession of the defendant.

The brief of counsel for the appellant criticizes certain portions'of the oral charge of the trial court, but we find no objection or exception thereto.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ison v. State
200 So. 2d 506 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)
Stewart v. State
165 So. 840 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 So. 914, 222 Ala. 688, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-state-ala-1931.