Bates v. Slade & Etheridge
This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 109 (Bates v. Slade & Etheridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant purchased three acres of land in the [110]*110southwest córner of lot number sixty-one, in the shape of a triangle ;■ the defendants owned sixty-one acres, embracing the northwest corner' of lot number sixty two, .which lay immediately south of lot number sixty-one, in the Cowetta Reserve of Muscogee county. The defendant,, who had a brick yard, adjacent, entered upon three and one-fourth acres in the northwest corner of lot number sixty-two and was excavating and removing the dirt to his brick yard, when a bill was filed to-enjoin him from so doing :
Held, that defendant had no title to the land so entered upon, andón the final trial a verdict and decree enjoining him from interfering: therewith was right.
(a) No error in the rulings below appears.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ga. L. Rep. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-slade-etheridge-ga-1885.