Bates v. Short

3 Pennyp. 495
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County·Decided May 24, 1883·No. No. 274·Published

Opinion

— Per Curiam :

We have carefully examined the evidence and considered the several specifications of error. The law is correctly declared and the evidence was sufficient to justify its submission to the jury. There was no error in admitting the note in evidence. There was some evidence of authority in the agent to make it for the sum therein specified.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bates v. Short, 3 Pennyp. 495 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1883).

3 Pennyp. 495 (Bates v. Short) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.