Bates v. [Respondent]

2020 Ohio 5022
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 22, 2020
Docket20 COA 027
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 Ohio 5022 (Bates v. [Respondent]) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bates v. [Respondent], 2020 Ohio 5022 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

[Cite as Bates v. [Respondent], 2020-Ohio-5022.]

COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

JUDGES: BRIAN BATES Hon. William B. Hoffman, P. J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. Petitioner Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J.

-vs- Case No. 20 COA 027

Respondent OPINION

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus

JUDGMENT: Dismissed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: October 22, 2020

APPEARANCES:

For Petitioner For Respondent

BRIAN BATES ASHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 1205 East Main Street Ashland, Ohio 44805 Ashland County, Case No. 20 COA 027 2

Wise, John, J.

{¶1} On October 13, 2020, Petitioner, Brian Bates, filed a Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus. He did not identify a respondent in his petition. Mr. Bates’s argument is

not easily followed, but he makes the following allegations in support of his writ: (1) “You

are making injurious ‘presumptions’ which prejudice my Constitutional rights. I am not a

vessel in commerce[.]” (2) “I am not a citizen, surety for subject of, an officer of, and do

not owe allegiance, fealty, bond undertaking, obligation, duty tax, impost, or tribute.

Matters are not being handled with efficiency, or are not being taken care of at all,

usurpation of funds is occurring, there is rampant fraud and deceit[.]” (3) “Deputy was

noticed at initial stop & crimes against my flesh & blood have been continual since.” (4)

“ ‘Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or

legislation would abrogate them[.’ ”]

{¶2} We find Mr. Bates cannot maintain an action for habeas corpus and his

petition is sua sponte dismissed. We are permitted to dismiss a habeas corpus petition

sua sponte if the petition does not contain a facially valid claim. State ex rel. Crigger v.

Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 82 Ohio St.3d 270, 271, 695 N.E.2d 254 (1988).

{¶3} Here, Mr. Bates failed to attach his commitment papers. The Court reviewed

the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction’s website

(https://appgateway.drc.ohio.gov/OffenderSearch/Search/Details/A748953) and

confirmed Mr. Bates was released from the Southeastern Correctional Institution on July

2, 2020. It appears Mr. Bates may be incarcerated in the Ashland County Jail. However,

without a copy of any commitment papers, and based on the information from the above

website, we must assume Mr. Bates is not currently incarcerated. Ashland County, Case No. 20 COA 027 3

{¶4} R.C. 2725.04(D) requires a copy of the commitment or cause of detention

be attached to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Without the commitment papers,

the writ of habeas corpus is fatally defective. Brown v. Rogers, 72 Ohio St.3d 339, 341,

650 N.E.2d 422 (1995). A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for habeas corpus that

fails to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D). See State ex rel. Wynn v. McFaul, 81 Ohio St.3d

193, 194, 690 N.E.2d 7 (1998) (Ohio Supreme Court affirmed court of appeals’ sua sponte

dismissal of habeas corpus petition for failure to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D).)

{¶5} We also note Mr. Bates failed to identify a proper respondent. This also

serves as an independent basis to sua sponte dismiss his writ. See State ex rel. Sherrills

v. State, 91 Ohio St.3d 133, 742 N.E.2d 651 (Ohio Supreme Court affirmed sua sponte

dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus because petitioner did not name proper

respondents.)

{¶6} Therefore, we dismiss Mr. Bates’s writ of habeas corpus. It appears he may

no longer be incarcerated and he submitted no commitment papers indicating otherwise.

Further, Mr. Bates failed to identify a proper respondent. Ashland County, Case No. 20 COA 027 4

{¶7} For the foregoing reasons, we sua sponte dismiss Mr. Bates’s Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon Mr. Bates

and the Ashland County Prosecutor notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the

journal. See Civ.R. 58(B).

By: Wise, John, J.

Hoffman, P. J., and

Wise, Earle, J., concur.

JWW/AC 1014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Rogers
650 N.E.2d 422 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
State ex rel. Wynn v. McFaul
690 N.E.2d 7 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
695 N.E.2d 254 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
State ex rel. Sherrills v. State
742 N.E.2d 651 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 Ohio 5022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-respondent-ohioctapp-2020.