Bates v. [Respondent]
This text of 2020 Ohio 5022 (Bates v. [Respondent]) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Bates v. [Respondent], 2020-Ohio-5022.]
COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JUDGES: BRIAN BATES Hon. William B. Hoffman, P. J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. Petitioner Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J.
-vs- Case No. 20 COA 027
Respondent OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus
JUDGMENT: Dismissed
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: October 22, 2020
APPEARANCES:
For Petitioner For Respondent
BRIAN BATES ASHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT 1205 East Main Street Ashland, Ohio 44805 Ashland County, Case No. 20 COA 027 2
Wise, John, J.
{¶1} On October 13, 2020, Petitioner, Brian Bates, filed a Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus. He did not identify a respondent in his petition. Mr. Bates’s argument is
not easily followed, but he makes the following allegations in support of his writ: (1) “You
are making injurious ‘presumptions’ which prejudice my Constitutional rights. I am not a
vessel in commerce[.]” (2) “I am not a citizen, surety for subject of, an officer of, and do
not owe allegiance, fealty, bond undertaking, obligation, duty tax, impost, or tribute.
Matters are not being handled with efficiency, or are not being taken care of at all,
usurpation of funds is occurring, there is rampant fraud and deceit[.]” (3) “Deputy was
noticed at initial stop & crimes against my flesh & blood have been continual since.” (4)
“ ‘Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or
legislation would abrogate them[.’ ”]
{¶2} We find Mr. Bates cannot maintain an action for habeas corpus and his
petition is sua sponte dismissed. We are permitted to dismiss a habeas corpus petition
sua sponte if the petition does not contain a facially valid claim. State ex rel. Crigger v.
Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 82 Ohio St.3d 270, 271, 695 N.E.2d 254 (1988).
{¶3} Here, Mr. Bates failed to attach his commitment papers. The Court reviewed
the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction’s website
(https://appgateway.drc.ohio.gov/OffenderSearch/Search/Details/A748953) and
confirmed Mr. Bates was released from the Southeastern Correctional Institution on July
2, 2020. It appears Mr. Bates may be incarcerated in the Ashland County Jail. However,
without a copy of any commitment papers, and based on the information from the above
website, we must assume Mr. Bates is not currently incarcerated. Ashland County, Case No. 20 COA 027 3
{¶4} R.C. 2725.04(D) requires a copy of the commitment or cause of detention
be attached to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Without the commitment papers,
the writ of habeas corpus is fatally defective. Brown v. Rogers, 72 Ohio St.3d 339, 341,
650 N.E.2d 422 (1995). A court may sua sponte dismiss a petition for habeas corpus that
fails to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D). See State ex rel. Wynn v. McFaul, 81 Ohio St.3d
193, 194, 690 N.E.2d 7 (1998) (Ohio Supreme Court affirmed court of appeals’ sua sponte
dismissal of habeas corpus petition for failure to comply with R.C. 2725.04(D).)
{¶5} We also note Mr. Bates failed to identify a proper respondent. This also
serves as an independent basis to sua sponte dismiss his writ. See State ex rel. Sherrills
v. State, 91 Ohio St.3d 133, 742 N.E.2d 651 (Ohio Supreme Court affirmed sua sponte
dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus because petitioner did not name proper
respondents.)
{¶6} Therefore, we dismiss Mr. Bates’s writ of habeas corpus. It appears he may
no longer be incarcerated and he submitted no commitment papers indicating otherwise.
Further, Mr. Bates failed to identify a proper respondent. Ashland County, Case No. 20 COA 027 4
{¶7} For the foregoing reasons, we sua sponte dismiss Mr. Bates’s Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon Mr. Bates
and the Ashland County Prosecutor notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the
journal. See Civ.R. 58(B).
By: Wise, John, J.
Hoffman, P. J., and
Wise, Earle, J., concur.
JWW/AC 1014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 Ohio 5022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-respondent-ohioctapp-2020.