Bates v. Reiskenhianzer
9 Ind. 178
Opinion
In this case a motion in arrest of judgment affirmed the finding of the Court below, and cut off the motion for a new trial. 7 Ind. R. 406 and 706
The judgment is affirmed with 1 per cent. damages and costs.
And see Smith v. Porter, 5 Ind. R. 429.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bates v. Reiskenhianzer, 9 Ind. 178 (Ind. 1857).
9 Ind. 178 (Bates v. Reiskenhianzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grider v. Scharf
73 N.E.2d 75 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1947)
Yazel v. State
84 N.E. 972 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1908)
Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Case
23 N.E. 797 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)