Bates v. Reiskenhianzer
9 Ind. 178
This text of 9 Ind. 178 (Bates v. Reiskenhianzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bates v. Reiskenhianzer, 9 Ind. 178 (Ind. 1857).
Opinion
In this case a motion in arrest of judgment affirmed the finding of the Court below, and cut off the motion for a new trial. 7 Ind. R. 406 and 706
The judgment is affirmed with 1 per cent. damages and costs.
And see Smith v. Porter, 5 Ind. R. 429.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Grider v. Scharf
73 N.E.2d 75 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1947)
Yazel v. State
84 N.E. 972 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1908)
Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Case
23 N.E. 797 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 Ind. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-reiskenhianzer-ind-1857.