Bates v. Pakseresht

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 2026
Docket23-4169
StatusPublished

This text of Bates v. Pakseresht (Bates v. Pakseresht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bates v. Pakseresht, (9th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESSICA BATES, No. 23-4169 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00474- AN v.

Director FARIBORZ ORDER PAKSERESHT, in his official capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services; Deputy Director LIESL WENDT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services; APRILLE FLINT- GERNER, in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services Child Welfare Division; REBECCA GARRISON, in her official capacity as certification supervisor for the Oregon Department of Human Services office in Malheur County; CECILIA GARCIA, in her official capacity as certification officer for the Oregon Department of Human Services office in Malheur Count,

Defendants - Appellees. 2 BATES V. PAKSERESHT

Filed February 13, 2026

Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Richard R. Clifton, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A judge of this court sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc. A vote was taken, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 40. Rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bates v. Pakseresht, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-pakseresht-ca9-2026.