Bates v. New Orleans, B. R. & V. R.

16 F. 294
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York·Decided July 1, 1883·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Coxe, J.

The real contention in this case is between the plaintiff and the Louisiana corporations. The defendants McCook and Alexander, who are citizens of New York, are sued merely in their representative character as trustees. Their connection with the controversy is collateral and subsidiary to the main issue. No personal demand is made against them or either of them. Their presence on the record may be necessary to effectuate the relief sought by the plaintiff, but their citizenship ought not to be considered on the question of removal. Bacon v. Rives, 106 U. S. 99; [S. C. 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 3;] Pond v. Sibley, 19 Blatchf. 189, 196; [S. C. 7 Fed. Rep. 129;] Barney v. Latham, 103 U. S. 205.

Tin*, motion to remand should be denied.

See Deford v. Mehaffy, 14 Fed. Rep. 181, and note, 182.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bates v. New Orleans, B. R. & V. R., 16 F. 294 (circtndny 1883).

16 F. 294 (Bates v. New Orleans, B. R. & V. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gill v. Frances Inv. Co.
19 F.2d 880 (Ninth Circuit, 1927)
Interstate Refineries, Inc. v. Barry
7 F.2d 548 (Eighth Circuit, 1925)