Bates v. MHM Correctional Services

Third Circuit

Bates v. MHM Correctional Services

321 F. App'x 217

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 2009

DocketNo. 08-1729

StatusPublished

This text of 321 F. App'x 217 (Bates v. MHM Correctional Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bates v. MHM Correctional Services, 321 F. App'x 217 (3d Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

RUGGERO J. ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

After consideration of all contentions raised by the Appellant, it is ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in the February 11, 2008, 2008 WL 396225, opinion of the Honorable James M. Munley, District Judge, the judgment of the District Court be, and is, hereby AFFIRMED. Costs are taxed against the Appellant.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Ruggero J. Aldisert Circuit Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT ORDER

RUGGERO J. ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

After consideration of all contentions raised by the Appellant, it is ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in the February 11, 2008, 2008 WL 396225, opinion of the Honorable James M. Munley, District Judge, the judgment of the District Court be, and is, hereby AFFIRMED. Costs are taxed against the Appellant.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Ruggero J. Aldisert Circuit Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

321 F. App'x 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-mhm-correctional-services-ca3-2009.