Bates v. Ludwig
71 N.Y.S. 1132
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 7, 1901
StatusPublished
This text of 71 N.Y.S. 1132 (Bates v. Ludwig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bates v. Ludwig, 71 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).
Opinion
Action by Mary T. Bates against Bernard J. Ludwig. S. H. Guggenheimer, for appellant. H. Nathan, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1095.
O’BRIEN and INGRAHAM, JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Howard v. Ludwig
57 A.D. 94 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-ludwig-nyappdiv-1901.