Bates v. Kelly
152 A.D.2d 1009, 544 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9962
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 1989·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record establishes that petitioner’s failure to select an employee assistant from the general list provided him was a circumstance of his own creation and did not amount to a deprivation of due process (see, Matter of Peart v Kelly, 134 AD2d 843, Iv denied 71 NY2d 801). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bates v. Kelly, 152 A.D.2d 1009, 544 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
152 A.D.2d 1009 (Bates v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. Coughlin
202 A.D.2d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Brown v. Coughlin
165 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)