Bates v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bates v. Kelly

152 A.D.2d 1009, 544 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9962

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 152 A.D.2d 1009 (Bates v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bates v. Kelly, 152 A.D.2d 1009, 544 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record establishes that petitioner’s failure to select an employee assistant from the general list provided him was a circumstance of his own creation and did not amount to a deprivation of due process (see, Matter of Peart v Kelly, 134 AD2d 843, Iv denied 71 NY2d 801). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record establishes that petitioner’s failure to select an employee assistant from the general list provided him was a circumstance of his own creation and did not amount to a deprivation of due process (see, Matter of Peart v Kelly, 134 AD2d 843, Iv denied 71 NY2d 801). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — art 78.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 A.D.2d 1009, 544 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack