Bates v. Johnston

138 F.2d 160, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2445
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 29, 1943·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Applicant seeks our order to allow him, without payment of costs, to prosecute his appeal from judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, filing with his petition the affidavit required by 28 U.S. C.A. § 832. The application alleges that a similar application to the district court denied him the right so to proceed because his appeal lacked the merit required also by § 832.

The permission to appeal rests with the court in which was commenced the proceeding in which the appeal is sought. Cf. Steffler v. United States, 319 U.S. 38, 41, 63 S.Ct. 948, 87 L.Ed. 1197; Stanley v. Swope, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 308; Kelly v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 582.

The petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bates v. Johnston, 138 F.2d 160, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2445 (9th Cir. 1943).

138 F.2d 160 (Bates v. Johnston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spruill v. Temple Baptist Church
141 F.2d 137 (D.C. Circuit, 1944)