Bates v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Bates v. Edwards

291 So. 2d 398, 1974 La. LEXIS 4632

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 26, 1974

DocketNo. 54601

StatusPublished

This text of 291 So. 2d 398 (Bates v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bates v. Edwards, 291 So. 2d 398, 1974 La. LEXIS 4632 (La. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Edwin W. Edwards, et al applying for Supervisory Writs.

Granted. See Order.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Steve A. Alford, Jr., Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 29th day of March, 1974, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 29th day of March, 1974, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Edwin W. Edwards, et al applying for Supervisory Writs.

Granted. See Order.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Steve A. Alford, Jr., Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 29th day of March, 1974, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 29th day of March, 1974, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 So. 2d 398, 1974 La. LEXIS 4632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-edwards-la-1974.