Bates v. Dewson

128 Mass. 334
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedFebruary 13, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 128 Mass. 334 (Bates v. Dewson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bates v. Dewson, 128 Mass. 334 (Mass. 1880).

Opinion

The Court

held that the question whether the legacy of $1000 lapsed by the death of Alexander Dewson before the death of the testator could not be decided, because the residuary devisees were not made parties, and

Discharged the report.

The bill was then amended by making the residuary devisees parties; and they answered, submitting their rights to the judgment of the court. The case was heard upon bill and answers, and reserved by Ames, J., for the determination of the full court; and was argued by the same counsel.

Gray, C. J.

The testator directed a house to be purchased, at a cost not exceeding one thousand dollars, to be held in trust for the benefit of Alexander Dewson during his life, and to be conveyed to his family at his death. The gift in remainder to “ his family ” did not lapse by his death in the lifetime of the testator. “ His family,” in the absence of words manifesting a different intention, must be taken to mean his widow and child; Bowditch v. Andrew, 8 Allen, 339, 342; and not to include his stepson. Ho provision being made as to the proportions in which his widow and child shall take, and the reasons for investing the money in a house having ceased with his life, the sum of one thousand dollars is to be paid to them in equal shares. As to the annuity of one hundred dollars, no question is presented by the bill. Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Magill v. Magill
56 N.E.2d 892 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)
Nelson v. Meade
149 A. 626 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1930)
Hiller v. Loring
136 A. 350 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1927)
Newman's Case
222 Mass. 563 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Mastellar v. Atkinson
146 P. 367 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1915)
Frelinghuysen v. New York Life Insurance & Trust Co.
77 A. 98 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1910)
Thompson v. Thornton
83 N.E. 880 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
In Re Estate of Bennett
66 P. 370 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
Bray v. Miles
54 N.E. 446 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
First National Bank of Amsterdam v. Miller
24 A.D. 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Wood v. Wood
28 A. 520 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1893)
Townsend v. Townsend
31 N.E. 632 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Dodge v. Boston & Providence Railroad
13 L.R.A. 318 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Bradlee v. Andrews
137 Mass. 50 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 Mass. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-v-dewson-mass-1880.