Bates, Kingsbery & Co. v. Shelton

25 S.E. 16, 99 Ga. 164
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 25 S.E. 16 (Bates, Kingsbery & Co. v. Shelton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bates, Kingsbery & Co. v. Shelton, 25 S.E. 16, 99 Ga. 164 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

A clerk of the superior court has no authority to issue an attachment sued out under the provisions of section 3297 et seq. of the code, unless the judge in granting the attachment expressly so directs. Under a special order commanding the clerk to issue the writ he may do so as the clerical servant of the judge, but in the absence of such an order he cannot, there being no provision of law authorizing him to issue writs of this kind. Loeb v. Smith, 78 Ga. 508, 510.

Judgment affirmed.

Clarke, Hooper & Harrison, for plaintiffs. Miller, Wynn & Miller and R. F. Watts, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loeb v. Smith Bros. & Co.
3 S.E. 458 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 16, 99 Ga. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-kingsbery-co-v-shelton-ga-1896.