Bates' Administrator v. Simpson

19 Ind. 388
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1862
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ind. 388 (Bates' Administrator v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bates' Administrator v. Simpson, 19 Ind. 388 (Ind. 1862).

Opinion

Hanna, J.

The complaint avers, that before the filing thereof, “a complaint which had been, previously, etc., within the time prescribed by the statute, filed, in favor of said plaintiffs, against said estate, for the sum of two hundred and two dollars and two cents, was allowed by this Court, at its December term of said year.” Ability to pay and non-payment were averred. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled, judgment against defendant.

It. is urged, that the complaint is defective, because no [389]*389copy of the record of allowance, nor of the claim allowed, is filed, and we are cited to Reasor v. Raney, 14 Ind. 441.

Asa Iglehart, for the appellant. Charles JE. Marsh, for the appellees.

The allowance made by the Court appears to have been the foundation of the action, and a transcript should, therefore, have been filed with the complaint, which was had in its absence.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reasor v. Raney
14 Ind. 441 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ind. 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bates-administrator-v-simpson-ind-1862.