Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bateman v. Taylor

Bateman v. Taylor

917 So. 2d 1009, 2006 WL 12937
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 2006·No. 4D04-3517·Published

Opinion

917 So.2d 1009 (2006)

Susan Gasink BATEMAN and Brooks W. Bateman, Appellants,
v.
Stephen D. TAYLOR, Jennifer Lynn Mathie and James M. Mathie, Appellees.

No. 4D04-3517.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 4, 2006.

Richard A. Sherman, Sr. of Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and James M. Munsey of Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards & O'Connor, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellants.

Paul Richard Bloomquist, Winter Haven, for Appellee-Stephen D. Taylor.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lamb v. Matetzschk, 906 So.2d 1037 (Fla.2005).

STONE, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bateman v. Taylor, 917 So. 2d 1009, 2006 WL 12937 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

917 So. 2d 1009 (Bateman v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lamb v. Matetzschk
906 So. 2d 1037 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)