Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bateman v. Taylor

Bateman v. Taylor

917 So. 2d 1009, 2006 WL 12937
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 2006
Docket4D04-3517
StatusPublished

This text of 917 So. 2d 1009 (Bateman v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bateman v. Taylor, 917 So. 2d 1009, 2006 WL 12937 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

917 So.2d 1009 (2006)

Susan Gasink BATEMAN and Brooks W. Bateman, Appellants,
v.
Stephen D. TAYLOR, Jennifer Lynn Mathie and James M. Mathie, Appellees.

No. 4D04-3517.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 4, 2006.

Richard A. Sherman, Sr. of Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and James M. Munsey of Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards & O'Connor, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellants.

Paul Richard Bloomquist, Winter Haven, for Appellee-Stephen D. Taylor.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lamb v. Matetzschk, 906 So.2d 1037 (Fla.2005).

STONE, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamb v. Matetzschk
906 So. 2d 1037 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
917 So. 2d 1009, 2006 WL 12937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bateman-v-taylor-fladistctapp-2006.