Bateman v. State
This text of 764 So. 2d 769 (Bateman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion on the ground that it was untimely filed. Appellant’s motion was properly filed within two years of the time that Appellant’s judgment and sentence became final. See Borghese v. State, 694 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)(citing Gust v. State, 535 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for reconsideration of Appellant’s motion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
764 So. 2d 769, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8774, 2000 WL 955598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bateman-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.